Sparing or sharing land? Views from agricultural scientists
نویسندگان
چکیده
Increased agricultural production through both intensification and extensification is a major driver of the current biodiversity crisis. As response, two contrasting approaches have been advocated: ‘land sparing’, which minimizes demand for farmland by increasing yield, sharing’, boosts densities wild populations on but decreases yields. While these useful in drawing attention to impact meeting growing global products biodiversity, they driven mainly conservation ecologists, often overlooked important issues related farming. scientists with practical experience developing, testing scaling alternative forms agriculture some most biodiversity-rich areas Latin America, Eastern Southern Africa South Asia, we are pointing this paper at what see as being limitations land sparing/sharing framework: (1) reliance yield-density relationships that focus trade-offs overlook synergies between (2) overemphasis crop neglecting other metrics performance may be more local farmers, strongly associated positive outcomes. It our hope will stimulate contribute framework, order develop together ecologists viable solutions improved conservation.
منابع مشابه
A comparison of land-sharing and land-sparing strategies for plant richness conservation in agricultural landscapes.
Strategies for conserving plant diversity in agroecosystems generally focus on either expanding land area in non-crop habitat or enhancing diversity within crop fields through changes in within-field management practices. In this study, we compare effects on landscape-scale species richness from such land-sharing or land-sparing strategies. We collected data in arable field, grassland, pasture,...
متن کاملReframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation.
Conservation biologists are devoting an increasing amount of energy to debating whether land sparing (high-yielding agriculture on a small land footprint) or land sharing (low-yielding, wildlife-friendly agriculture on a larger land footprint) will promote better outcomes for local and global biodiversity. In turn, concerns are mounting about how to feed the world, given increasing demands for ...
متن کاملLand sparing, land sharing, and the fate of Africa's lions.
Taxonomic bias in organismal research and conservation is well recognized, with focus disproportionately directed toward birds and mammals (1). Among mammals, carnivores often receive excessive attention and large carnivores are particularly well studied (2). Although papers reporting the population trends of a single species do not usually result in high-profile publications, an analysis of po...
متن کاملSimple or Simplistic ? Scientists ' Views on Occam '
This paper presents a discourse analysis of 40 semi-structured interviews with scientists on their views of Occam's razor and simplicity. It finds that there are many different interpretations and thoughts about the precise meaning of the principle as well as many scientists who reject it outright, or only a very limited version. In light of the variation of scientists' opinions, the paper look...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Biological Conservation
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0006-3207', '1873-2917']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109167